Friday, May 23, 2014

Historical Facts About Military Rule And Dictatorship

Over Ages, Juntas And Generals Never Reach The Presidency Without Walking Over Their Competitors And Their Opponents Dead Bodies, Or Any Other Dirty Way, Then They Use To Torture All Helpers Of Yesterday And Those Who Was The Causes Of Being At The Palace. That They Think It's Better To Be Surrounded By Corrupts As It's Easy To Extort Them.


"L'ÉTAT, C'EST MOI"

And as so, the people ruled, and satisfied. The rulers there didn't evolve anything but people's submission. First of all they used to unreel the democracy to them, the democracy has been detested by people and they believed in it's fiasco, thus the "dictator" word has been acceptable, and any remonstrance regarded as a heresy! That what happened in Europe itself at the twenties of last century.


They wont step down as long as they are alive, by making u always need them, always afraid from some terrorism and they are the only trustworthy fighters. They'll make anything that shows you how stately they are, and you'll believe, despite the fact that they are really flatulent; for one reason that you're ready to believe them as long as you see the ruler as a person not an idea.


And for those who use to fraud on Egypt's people by mentioning some names of former generals known as a normal and non-dictatorial presidents. You all know that no one of them has left the military life and moved directly to presidency or, rather, leave the military to be a president. But every one of them had a long life with the civil society, thereafter, being a general at a certain while of his life is just a feature of his credentials to the candidacy. Moreover, Egypt is not like those countries! at least we can't know anything about the military's budget. So, If you want their democracy, get the whole package!

The political life after coups "or semi-coups", differs from that after revolutions! 
The choice is not between the parliamentary system or the presidential system, you'll be under The Stratocracy, or a military dictatorship, or both of them merged together " its like having more of power with less of dominance".

The military rulers is as same as religious leaders; both of them use people's assessment to their bases in order to extend their influence. It doesn't stop at that extent, but, each of them use the other after getting the chair, and raise his statures.. to impact on people's emotions, exploiting people's trust to them.  And vice versa.
Revolutions swallow their owners, and those who left alive..at least lived depressed, or in a self-imposed exile.

Egypt is the first revolutionary country over history, but even that first revolution in the history has been failed. and the fact is, we have made many revolutions all over the written history - almost it is the most country - and they all failed, in comparison with France which have only one revolution to become [France] . 


‘‘ I Know How Frustrating My Words Are..But We All Are, The Rowdy Speeches About The New Egypt, Filled With Grassroots Activism And Progressive Idealism, Have Been Replaced With Talk Of Exile And Police Intimidation. Many Admit They Have Now Turned To Antidepressants To Keep Going. ’’


Blockheads always was the noble people for the dictator .

All dictators must have a tragic end that they never wish

 Countries always get better only by democracy and justice.

We have to learn from the history, or, we'll see ourselves in an endless sleazy drama.

And the last fact is, 25Jan revolution, has a goal - from many goals that nothing of them has done - which is ending the military rule in Egypt. 






No comments:

Post a Comment